Mr. Blaikie, I'll go over to you.
You specifically said that you were concerned about setting precedent. Would it be okay to set precedent if it was in relation to future pandemics? Would it make sense for us—you referenced a separate set of standing orders—to have a separate set of standing orders and a separate set of engagement so that, in case we suddenly face this pandemic, let's say five to 10 years from now, we have a precedent and we have a system that has been built in place so that it can be triggered immediately and we can default to it so we're not stumbling through it as we did this time?
In that case, would the precedent be worthwhile?