Evidence of meeting #13 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was pandemic.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

André Blais  Professor, Department of Political Science, Université de Montréal, As an Individual
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Justin Vaive
Dorota Blumczynska  Executive Director, Immigrant and Refugee Community Organization of Manitoba
Nicole Brayiannis  National Deputy Chairperson, Canadian Federation of Students
Kory Earle  President, People First of Canada
Shelley Fletcher  Executive Director, People First of Canada
Emilly Renaud  National Coordinator, Canada Without Poverty

1 p.m.

The Clerk

Madam Chair, I can confirm that P9 accounts for all the members would be included in that distribution, along with other identified staff members.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan, SK

Thank you.

1 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ruby Sahota

Perfect. Usually, the only time there's an exception to that is if you've requested another email to be used, so your P9 is not flooded. You should receive that tomorrow.

As you're going through the draft report over the weekend, please bring your suggested recommendations to the meeting on Tuesday. In order for Andre to insert them into the report, the deadline for recommendations is later on that day, Tuesday, December 1, at 5 p.m. You will have the opportunity during committee time that day to talk about the recommendations, and then a few hours after the committee meeting to make the submissions to Andre.

That will be a good way of doing it, so we have the benefit of talking to each other about them, and seeing where people are on it.

We have a meeting scheduled for December 10 with witnesses for the study on prorogation. That's going to be for 90 minutes. It's a three-hour meeting. The first 90 minutes will be the continuation of our study. Hopefully, we'll have the chief medical officers of Quebec and Ontario. The other 90 minutes of that meeting will be for the prorogation study.

Some parties have submitted a witness list. I would hope that all parties would submit their choice of witnesses as soon as possible. We're talking about having a constitutional expert, or an academic in that portion. We would only have enough space for four people on that panel, so I'm looking for one recommendation each.

As for that whole study, if you could start submitting recommendations for witnesses for the prorogation study, as well, so the clerk will have enough time to slot it in over the winter break, and start talking to witnesses, so we can be prepared when we come back. It gives him some flexibility to go back and forth with different organizations and people.

The suggestion would be that by December 11, which is the last sitting day of the House, we have the complete list of witnesses from all parties for that whole study, or as complete as you can make it, so we can start planning.

I need the one witness for now, and then by December 11, the rest of the witnesses for the prorogation issue.

Does anyone have any questions? No.

I'll see you on Tuesday.

The meeting is adjourned.