I want to come back to my initial question but maybe in a new way.
In 2015, we had a prime minister and a party that formed a new government that recognized the problem with abuses of prorogation. Their answer was to require a report to be filed after prorogation. I think we're seeing that this answer comes up short in some ways. It's better than what we had before, but it's not the gold standard.
In your view, in regard to a government that was really keenly determined to prevent future abuses of prorogation, what are some additional steps that such a government could have taken, and could take now, if they were really focused on the question of preventing abuse rather than talking about it after the fact?
Monsieur Taillon, and then Mr. Bratt if we have time left.