I have a point of order, Madam Chair.
We had that five-minute break, and the decision was that you want something in writing. I just want to ask for clarification before you continue. There was a request for something in writing. Can I ask what we're going to get in turn? Are you guys going to stop filibustering? Is that what comes in turn? I'm listening to this, and the negotiations, if we're going to negotiate.... Daniel has asked, “What are the plans?” You guys have said, “We want something in writing.” Please share with me. Is this what's holding you up, having something from us in writing, for us to figure out how to get you guys to stop talking on this filibuster? I just want to ensure we're all on the same page here.
As I said, this morning I really thought there was good faith. I'll be honest. I recognize we're in a political theatre. I get that, but I can tell you in good conscience that I have been trying—and I do believe many others have been trying—to find a true right to negotiation. Let's not continue to filibuster. Why don't we talk this out rather than listening to this garblegoop? It's very important information, but if I chose to read the reports that Ryan read to me today, I could have chosen to read those reports. Instead, I've listened to them.
I prefer to talk about what the procedure and house affairs committee is supposed to be doing, how we're actually going to get to a vote and how we're actually going to get our report done. It's funny. If the opposition decides to sit on their hands, we will be doing this until Parliament is adjourned. Is this what I understand? I just want to see.... Is there going to be no closure? Is that the plan?