Madam Chair, I'm really sorry that my colleagues didn't support my amendment, which I thought was an attempt to be reasonable and appease some of my colleagues from across the aisle, but obviously that didn't carry.
I still have quite a few concerns with the original motion. It focuses on an extraordinarily burdensome production of documents. It has all kinds of other things in it that are pretty significant issues that I take issue with and would like to express my views on.
Also, we know that opposition parties seem to be focused on prorogation and trying to link it to the WE Charity. I will just note that a recent media report came out on the ethics commissioner's investigation of this, which has said that the Prime Minister was not in a conflict of interest. Therefore, it sort of goes to the heart of what our members have been saying for quite some time, which was that prorogation—