I just want to speak to Mr. Nater's point of order.
I think repetition is a well-known rhetorical device. It has been around since the Greek Polis, so it literally is part of our democratic history. The Sophists use it. I'm sure Mr. Nater has used it from time to time as well in his speeches.
I don't think it's very fair to interrupt Ms. Duncan on the basis of repetition. I think she's emphasizing a very important point that she feels passionate about, and I would appreciate it if the member were to respect the fact that she's, I think, making a really valid argument. I certainly feel passionately and strongly about her words. The repetition in there is the emphasis, and I think that's important.