Well, yes, we don't have Mr. Nater's subamendment that he had put in place, so it wouldn't prevent the committee, if the committee wished to do something in between or do something when it has completed the prorogation study. That's correct, Ms. Vecchio.
It's always up to the committee, and there's nothing that is stopping the committee from moving on to other work if this work is completed.
Perhaps we can move to a vote. I don't see why this would be too complicated or we would need any kind of suspension for this. It's simply going to replace two dates. The dates that we had first adopted through Mr. Blaikie's motion were June 8 for the completion of the report and June 11 for the tabling. Monsieur Therrien's subamendment now proposes June 15 for completion of the report and then June 18 for the tabling of the report.
Monsieur Therrien and Mr. Blaikie, do you have some comments?