Madam Chair, I don't necessarily have a lot more to add other than to reiterate the point about committee business.
Generally, when a committee is meeting under committee business—and currently for meeting 27 the item of business that the committee has been engaged in is committee business, even though the committee has been debating Ms. Vecchio's motion and Mr. Turnbull's amendment—that would suggest that other possible proposals for the committee to work on, such as the notices of motion that we already have, including now this new suggestion by Mr. Turnbull, would not need to meet the notice requirement.
The means that Mr. Turnbull is suggesting with his current motion would be to move to essentially another order of the day. That would, if successful, drop the committee back into committee business, which would open the floor for his new suggestion for a motion. The way in which he has proposed it would essentially replace the item that is currently under debate with his new suggestion that he has brought forward at this point. The first step, however, of course, is for the committee to decide, in fact, if they want to move to a new order of business.