On that same point of order, Madam Chair.
You will forgive me as a new member of the committee, who is not exactly familiar with all the routine motions that have just passed recently. I know that on other committees the notice requirement stands unless there is a substantive motion that pertains directly to the business before the committee.
In this case, if were discussing committee business, it seems to me that unless that rule doesn't apply, it would be in order for any one member of the committee to re-move the motion that Ms. Blaney had presented to the committee simply because we're discussing committee business at this time.
Unless there's something I don't know about PROC, it seems to me that it would be perfectly in order to move the motion that Ms. Blaney had presented, given that it relates to the business before the committee.