I mentioned the ability to adapt being in our legislation, but not the ability to change. I think that was one of our real challenges, unlike in B.C., where they did allow for telephone voting. I could not introduce telephone voting or any other kind, so there has to be a recognition that there are limitations with respect to how far you can go.
We pushed our system by introducing extraordinary voting, and that was beyond voting by mail, which was the primary source of providing options for people who couldn't go to the polls. We went beyond that with extraordinary voting, which involves using messengers and couriers in order to provide ballots to individuals who couldn't get to the poll, but even that had its limitations, sadly, in a COVID-19 context. That's one thing to think about.
The other thing is that I was working under the premise, with the chief medical health officer, that there would be very few communities that would actually shut down and would be in lockdown. With first nations, that was the situation, but in other communities, that wasn't the context. If people could go to their local grocery store, we, as a critical service—election administration—would be able to continue to deliver the polling location as long as we were following the protocols of the chief medical health officer. This didn't involve a big gathering of people, because we had been spreading out the voting significantly over the course of the electoral process, beginning on August 15 and moving all the way to October 26. As a result, we had prepared in advance and had capacity for an increased number of COVID-19 cases. The number was much higher than it had been at the beginning of the writ period, but we were able to manage that process.