Thank you very much.
We've heard in the testimony so far that even if the voting process itself is safe, provided that directions are followed as they should be, in the event of an extreme outbreak people's confidence in the safety of the process might be shaken.
In your opinion, whom does it properly belong to to make a decision or a call about the point at which—even if the public health orders are good and would permit a voting process that's safe from a health point of view—it would not be appropriate to have an election for fear that voter turnout would simply be too low because people are concerned or worried about their personal health if they engage in that voting process? Who do you think ought to make that call? Is it public health officials? Is it election authorities, or is it the political side of the equation?