I think because I represent public health.... Again, I can't put words in the premier's mouth. Certainly, any time that I was asked what my role was in the election and decisions around it, I said that the only input I really had was how to do it safely.
Obviously, if you're going to try to reduce the risk to zero, that's impossible. No matter what the outbreak situation is and no matter how many daily cases you have, it does change the risks and we can't ever make them zero.
In our Atlantic bubble, we've been successful at keeping our case numbers low and keeping our outbreaks small and short. We have the luxury of having a low-risk setting to have an election. Our experience is going to be very different from what the federal experience will be, in the sense that it's hard to predict where the second wave is going or when it's going to peak.
The projected numbers right now are that by mid- to late November, the cases in Canada are going to go up to 8,000 per day. With the global risks increasing and lockdowns happening in Europe and England, it's hard to say when things are going to change in terms of the risk setting—the backdrop in which you'll have to make those decisions.
Certainly, we would never say whether to have an election or not. We would just say, this is how to make it as safe as possible, knowing that the risk will never be zero in a global pandemic.