Okay. I've learned a lot about procedure thanks to you. We're here to find out what really happened, too. For the record, I'd like to do a little recap, and you can tell me if I have it right.
So, the Speaker of the House of Commons invited a person who obtained Canadian citizenship in the 1950s. The Speaker submitted his guest list to you, and you then forwarded it to security for verification and analysis, as per established protocol. And yet nothing could have led us to believe that this man's presence in the gallery could have posed a threat to our government. Your mandate didn't extend any further than that. The lists aren't released.
The event then unfolded, and what was meant to happen, happened. We recognized the presence in the gallery of a person posing a reputational risk.
Could we somehow use this opportunity to improve the security protocol so that, in the future, on top of the usual security checks, it also includes a reputational risk assessment, in the interest of protecting our government?