Mr. Hunka appeared nowhere on the Internet until after the incident, so I'm not sure how anyone googling him or looking for him online would have found anything. When the controversy erupted, suddenly a very sophisticated Wikipedia page appeared about the Hunka scandal—or whatever they called it—which I think originated in Qatar, which we know, of course, is a hotbed of historical studies on Ukraine and World War II. Clearly, it's a fabricated page, made to continue the controversy.
How could anyone vet someone like Yaroslav Hunka? He's a completely innocent Canadian who has committed no crimes. If you had looked at police records, security records or RCMP records, what would you have found? Nothing. He's a 98-year-old man in a wheelchair, a taxpayer, a family man and man who served in the Canadian military for two years in the militia. He has a perfect record in Canada, 70 years of it. What would you have vetted?
Now, the fact is that, as I say, some people, for physical security, of course.... If someone has threatened Parliament or has threatened a member of Parliament, that person should not be allowed into the House, absolutely, but this is the people's House. You can't just suddenly have your staffers decide who gets in because they found something on the Internet. Are you kidding? If you go on the Internet, I'm sure.... Well, you all do. I know you all do. There's so much garbage there. Are you going to use that to vet Canadians?