History, like any other discipline, has schools of thought and different opinions. You need to base yourself on evidence.
Mere membership in the Galicia Division, as Justice Deschênes concluded back in 1987, is insufficient for prosecution. Membership in the Galicia Division is not a crime, according to Justice Deschênes.
These people were screened. There's been no evidence put forward that Mr. Hunka, whom we're talking about, committed any crimes. However, my colleague has suggested this man shouldn't have been in Parliament. Why? Why not? It's because he was a member of the Galicia Division. Okay, so there's a difference of opinion there.
The fact is that we had a commission of inquiry established by the Government of Canada, which continued for nearly two years. It was a very difficult period of time, I can assure you. The Canadian Jewish Congress, B'nai Brith and the Ukrainian Canadian Congress were all represented there. They had standing before that commission, and we welcomed the results.
Thirty-seven years later, you can't say that you don't like the results. You can't say that this Canadian can't come to Parliament because I disagree with his opinions or this Canadian can't come to Parliament because I find him disagreeable.
Just going on Google or Wikipedia and searching for information is pretty fraught, I would think. I'm not sure you'd invite me.