My point of order is about the continued reference to the motion that was passed by PROC on November 21. I had unsuccessfully attempted—and had been blocked—from talking about an access to information request that was provided in the media on February 5. We passed this motion on November 21; the information was not revealed.
I'm trying to raise new information that is very relevant to the individual named in this study that we are looking at, and I'm being refused. If we're going to reference this November 21 date by PROC, then we should also acknowledge that new information has come in since that motion was passed on November 21, and I have every right to raise that and ask questions.