On that point of order, I would respectfully disagree. Mr. Duncan doesn't have the right to do that. What Mr. Duncan has the right to do is to keep within the scope of the motion.
He certainly had the right to try to amend the study. The Conservatives could have come forward and said, “We would like to now broaden the scope of the study.” The committee could have debated that before inviting witnesses, but when we invite witnesses here who think the meeting and the study are about one thing and then try to introduce new topics when they arrive, it's unfair to the witnesses.
You've ruled on this many times. You keep getting push-back from Mr. Duncan on this. He's not respecting your role as a chair, Madam Chair. I would strongly encourage you to ask him to come to order, or perhaps he would like to not participate in the meeting if he is not capable of staying within the rules that you have very clearly laid out.