That's a bit of a challenge, obviously, because the chamber, the House, is designed to be adversarial. Can any of you offer members of this committee any advice on the definition of “adversarial” versus the definition of “harassment”? It's designed to be that way, and members of Parliament do feel uncomfortable. We're made to feel uncomfortable by our constituents. We're made to feel uncomfortable, and we shouldn't feel comfortable in our jobs. This is the nature of our democracy.
In the delineation of feeling uncomfortable because of the duties in the adversarial environment that we're in by design, how do we rationalize feeling uncomfortable because of harassment or feeling uncomfortable because of the political pressure that is placed on us in an adversarial system?