It's a very good question, Mr. Calkins, because you're right. The House of Commons is a very unique workplace with a very unique mandate, as you just described. Any definition of the acceptable roles of members in the House, either on the government side or opposition side, versus what falls into the area of harassment is something I anticipate this committee would want to reflect on if it decided to go that route. Any regime, if one were to be put into place, would have to take into account the fact that proceedings in the chamber and in committee are overseen by parliamentary privilege.
Michel, do you want to expand a bit on that?