I'll try to be brief. I have two big questions, unfortunately, within two and a half minutes.
There's a concern of mine, as we try to move forward—and maybe this would be for the subcommittee to talk about—about getting the opinions of members of Parliament on how we start to deal with these issues.
Obviously, we want that to be protected. Do you have any advice for this committee on how that could happen in terms of ensuring that even former members, members who are not reoffering and current members can be protected in terms of anonymity if we start to survey them? Is there a mechanism in place that could do that on this issue?
The other question I'll squeeze in is about witnesses. We are seeing witnesses not come forward as much at committee. We are also seeing this clipping culture, these gotcha political moments that are now turning on members of academia or those incredible stakeholders that we rely on so much. What can we do to better protect them? They are protected under privilege, yet when they leave here, their testimony is used against them to a point where they may not return, and that's really quite critical. I'd like your opinions on that.