I have 15 seconds left.
That still seems fairly unclear. I understand there are a lot of threats. However, if an individual member, because of work they're doing on a foreign policy issue, is specifically targeted by a foreign government—not a generalized threat—it would seem reasonable to me that the member has a right to know, especially when they can take remedial action to protect themselves in both their parliamentary and non-parliamentary accounts.
You're saying it's still not a certainty they would be told.