Thank you.
I asked you a series of questions in my first round about what you communicated with the House of Commons. I noticed something afterwards when I was reviewing this. I asked if you informed House administration about the source of the attack. You said you had informed them about “what we believed at that time to be the originating source of the threat”.
I asked you in follow-up, “You shared, with House of Commons administration, the source of the attack—this being APT31”. Then your response changed. You suggested that we go in camera. You variously dodged the follow-ups. At no point did you confirm that APT31 was identified to House of Commons administration as the threat.
I want to press that point, because I noticed that you didn't answer about APT31 specifically. Did you at any point inform House of Commons administration that APT31 specifically was the source of the attack?