It could have been. Okay.
This is the problem we have with the government's narrative. They said House of Commons IT was told and they were supposed to tell MPs, but you said there may have been caveats. You can't confirm whether there were, but there may have been caveats. You also can't confirm whether the House of Commons was even told that APT31 was the source of the threat. How in the world could House of Commons IT have informed members of Parliament if there were caveats and if they weren't informed who the source or the actor was?
We've had you here twice. We've asked you specific questions about that information being passed along. You haven't been able to answer. You've told us that there might have been caveats; the information might have been shared, or it might not have been shared; it might have been in a document, but you're not sure which document; and you're not precisely sure of the timeline.
Do you see how this—