I appreciate all the discussion on this and the back-and-forth. I would agree with the Conservatives that the part about putting in “as part of the study of Bill C-65” is a bit repetitive, considering the minister would come for that anyway. I'm not sure what the cleanest way to do this is, but I think, to try to bring everyone together—as I always try to do—I could do this two ways.
I think it might work if I first bring forward a subamendment to the amendment. Ultimately, it would change Mr. Turnbull's move to one hour back to two. We would keep the removal of the “14 days of the adoption of this motion”, but we would then remove “as part of the study of Bill C-65”. That's so everyone can come together, move on with this and vote for it.
We all get a bit. We all give a bit.