Thank you very much, Mr. Chair.
Through you, and with greatest respect, Mr. Turnbull, the effect of this amendment is to gut the motion. It entirely guts the motion. The fact is that we're going to hear from the minister on Bill C‑65, otherwise more properly known as the loser Liberal pension protection act. We're going to hear from him on that. He has a lot to answer for on that bill with respect to inserting into a so-called elections bill a clause that protects the pensions of soon-to-be defeated Liberal MPs.
As Mr. Duncan stated, when I went home, Canadians were absolutely disgusted by this cynical and corrupt attempt to pad the pockets of soon-to-be defeated Liberal MPs. Boy, I can tell you, Canadians can't wait for a carbon tax election to throw out one of the most corrupt governments in Canadian history. Be that as it may, we're going to hear from the minister, and he has a lot to answer for on his cynical and corrupt loser Liberal pension protection act.
However, we also need to probe the minister on his obstruction and the Prime Minister's obstruction of Madam Justice Hogue's inquiry, the refusal of the minister to name the 11 compromised MPs and the refusal of the minister to clarify whether any of those compromised MPs sit in Justin Trudeau's cabinet, which, I think, says everything Canadians need to know.
The effect of Mr. Turnbull's motion would put us in a position where this motion wouldn't even need to be put forward, because we're going to hear from the minister on the loser Liberal pension protection act. The purpose of this motion is to hear from the minister on a much broader range of topics and to hear him for two hours in a separate meeting.