Okay. Still, fraud prevention and the integrity of the election is paramount. This does sound like something that could potentially happen. I don't know why we would expose ourselves to that if we ever decided to move away from that.
I have some other questions. I'm not a linguist—that's my daughter, who's good at this kind of stuff—so I'll be asking some questions. I don't know who best can answer them.
Just for clarity, from your description, it sounds to me like Inuktut is more of a phonetic language, using the syllables, than it is a grammatical issue. You can have several candidates with similar names. These things happen. You have now 343 or so ridings that will be in play in the next election. Are you confident that you'll have enough people who are fluent in the various dialects, for lack of a better word? What do you do at that point in time? If the variance between the names is so little, even on the English and French sides of the equation, then one could only assume that they would be very similar in the various regions where the languages are used in Nunavut. Will this be a problem?