I would answer in two ways.
I have the power, under the act, to make certain adaptations. For a stopgap measure, we always typically allow for the possibility of printing copies of the ballot locally, without the stub and counterfoil, irrespective of what we're talking about here today in terms of languages. That's simply because there's a risk—weather or other circumstances—that we cannot get the ballot into some fly-in communities in time. There's always a stopgap measure. In that case, with adaptation of the legislation, the vote can proceed with, essentially, copied ballots, which are hand-numbered. We haven't had to use it, but it's always very close.
For a more fulsome solution, the alternative is to remove the counterfoil requirement. This is something unique at the federal level, to my knowledge. Provinces and territories do not have that element in their ballot format. That's something that brings a broader series of considerations to the table.