I'm not sure what you're getting at. If you're talking about the risk of providing that information to members of Parliament, then that's a great question that this committee should be seized with. Again, my bill doesn't tackle that issue, because I knew that it's very difficult to suss out the whole level of detail in a private member's bill. However, let's just use two or three specific examples.
We've had two ad hoc committees on the Afghan detainee file and on the Winnipeg labs. Was there any risk? Did any of those parliamentarians who received the appropriate security clearance leak anything to the public they shouldn't have? We've had NSICOP established now since 2017 with the most sensitive information at a much higher level. Has there been a single leak to the public or whatever?
There are consequences, you know, and that's part of going through the process that I'm trying to make everybody understand. When you go through the security clearance process, just by going through the process and applying, you become better educated and more aware of how important it is to protect information that is sensitive or classified in nature.