When I said that Bill C‑377 was useless, according to you, I was referring to the fact that you called it “useless”. What you really meant was unnecessary. You rephrased it clearly. No retaliation, please.
As I understand it, the government has repeatedly tried to protect information, parliamentarians want to know the information, and there is a committee of parliamentarians—which you helped set up—but it doesn't have sufficient analysis powers.
That is why you think Bill C‑377 is certainly not necessary if we focus on the information that's already available.
Do I have that right?