The one piece I'll add to Dr. Giles's comments is that with our international partnerships, when we develop the sharing frameworks and mechanisms, how we use the information is spelled out as part of those mechanisms at the start, but it is also contained in each piece of intelligence that we exchange.
The intelligence will come to us or, conversely, our intelligence will be shared with a partner. It will say the security level at which it must be kept, but it will also say how that information can be used.
Often, when we receive a piece of intelligence, it will say, “This may be used by your department or by appropriately cleared members of the Government of Canada for investigation or for intelligence, but not for court proceedings,” for example. For each piece of intelligence, it is specified how it may be used and by whom, which I think is a critical element in all of this. If we want to use it differently, that's where we go back to the partners to say, “Now we may want to use this as part of a court proceeding. Can we use it in an affidavit?” for example.