I'll carry things forward in terms of the checks and balances that are there, or not there, in this bill, and where we're left.
When someone gets a security clearance, there must be some sort of training or education they undergo. That isn't necessarily provided within this legislation. Is it possible to ensure that members of Parliament understand their obligations, and the difference between evidence and intelligence? How would you prescribe that for members of Parliament, specifically within our rules? I know it depends on the actual information that may come later, but I mean in general.