Here's my point, though. Yes, we're using up a lot of resources to do security clearances for individuals who might turn out not to have a need to know information for which they've applied for security clearance. Because we're reversing the onus and we're saying members of Parliament can decide for themselves whether they need to access that information, now a lot more resources would be used to do security clearance and screening for them, when they may turn out not to have a need to know the information for which they've applied to get access.
Is that not correct?