I caution against that, only because we have clause-by-clause already planned. We have a question of privilege that's very likely coming our way in the immediate future. That's going to disrupt the schedule we already have, and I suspect we may need time, if we get through clause-by-clause in an efficient manner, to go into committee business to talk about the question of privilege. We have a harassment study that's supposed to pick up on Thursday, if we keep it, and we still need some witnesses for that.
Those are my two cents, Ms. Mathyssen. I appreciate the suggestion, but for the sake of keeping us effective and efficient in our planning purposes, written testimony is perhaps the better route to go down, should that be the will of the committee.
Mr. Ruff, I know you want to speak to this briefly.