That's an excellent point. In fact, I think that's a very valid point that may come up as part of a future discussion, or maybe another amendment.
Again, I'm not talking about parliamentary privilege, because the amendment and the subamendment don't actually talk about parliamentary privilege; they just talk about a process. The process that's laid out in the amendment and the subamendment, again, is more of a statement of what they should or shouldn't do, but ultimately this process.... The government, if it chose today.... Let's pretend my bill never got debated and wasn't part of the discussion here today, but a committee or a group of parliamentarians.... Let's just pick somebody. Let's just say that, before I was put on NSICOP as a member with top secret security clearance, when I got elected, I had asked to see, based on my background, the daily intelligence brief that is produced by the Canadian Forces at the Canadian joint operations command. I want to see that document every day; I want to know.
Would the government likely grant me access to that document just because I had a top secret security clearance?