I think that's actually a good idea. I encourage the government to bring forth that sort of clarity. But the purpose...and this is why I'm making the case that this is beyond the scope of my bill. My bill has nothing to do with that. My bill allows parliamentarians to apply for a security clearance. That's it. It doesn't talk about the sharing of information. It doesn't talk about granting access to anything.
Again, my question goes back to this: If the bill were to be passed as currently written and currently approved, including the amendment, would that somehow stop the government from putting those safeguards or processes in place?