The challenge of the chair has been brought forward by Mr. Ruff.
We are now going to vote on whether to uphold the ruling that I've just given.
For clarity, Mr. Ruff does not believe that what Mr. Duguid has just moved should be admissible. I am saying that I disagree with Mr. Ruff. I believe that it is within the scope of the bill and that it is admissible. Mr. Ruff has challenged that ruling.
We are now voting on my ruling, and then we will continue.
(Ruling of the chair sustained: yeas 7; nays 4)
For clarity, colleagues, on what this vote means, my decision is carried. The amendment is admissible.
On the speaking list, I have Ms. Mathyssen, followed by Mr. Calkins, followed by Mr. Duncan, followed by Mr. Cooper.
Go ahead, Ms. Mathyssen.