Yes. I think you're not going to have a citizen group that has, from products or sales or services, anywhere near 90% of their revenue coming in. I don't think it is, in effect, a loophole, the 10% threshold that you're talking about, but yes, it could be lowered to zero. There's nothing wrong with that.
There is something else that I should point out. The bill only takes into account whether you received more than 10% of your revenue from contributions during the previous calendar year or fiscal year. You can choose. That means a third party could receive the money at any time past the previous 12 months and be able to use it. You'd only have to establish that for one year and have those contributions for that one year. It really doesn't close the loophole. It still allows for the funnelling, as long as it happens 12 months before the election occurs.