Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I would like to come back to the two questions that I asked earlier. I want to say that the date change actually means two things. It isn't just a date. It means giving religion precedence over democracy. This date change may also adversely affect turnout
Mr. Chair, when a witness doesn't have time to answer our questions, they can also submit their responses in writing. I obviously encourage the minister to do so if he has more to say on these matters. We'll take this into account in our proceedings.
My next question concerns, once again, voter turnout, particularly with regard to subclauses 38(1) and 38(2) of Bill C‑65. These subclauses would amend subsections 243.01(1) and 243.01(2), respectively, of the Canada Elections Act. These provisions concern the fact that a person may accompany an elector who requires assistance to vote. You talked about this in your opening remarks, I believe.
Subclause 38(1) proposes to expand the eligibility of people who may accompany electors into the voting compartment. I would like to know the reason for this proposal.
In addition, subclause 38(2) proposes to repeal a provision concerning the solemn declaration of the person accompanying the elector into the voting compartment. This person used to need to sign a solemn declaration stating that they wouldn't disclose the vote or try to influence it. I would like to know the reason for the proposal to simply repeal this provision.
I have a great deal of respect for voters who need assistance. However, if we really want to make their vote legitimate, I don't understand why we would make this change. I would like to hear your explanations.