I withdraw my words, Mr. Chair, and I will rephrase them to say that the Prime Minister has a proven record of misrepresenting the facts.
No wonder the Leader of the Opposition isn't going to trust this Prime Minister to say, I'm going to give you what I want you to look at and maybe hide other things from you and give you an incomplete picture of things. That's what the Prime Minister is proposing, and the Leader of the Opposition isn't going to take the Prime Minister's bait. He's not going to play the Prime Minister's game. The Leader of the Opposition has instead called on the Prime Minister to simply release the names of all compromised MPs, and the Prime Minister continues to refuse to do so, just as he covered up for the member for Don Valley North.
No, the Leader of the Opposition will not take lessons, and Conservatives will not take lessons, from this Prime Minister and this government when it comes to foreign interference because the record of this government is a shocking in this regard. It's actually drawn concern amongst our allies and international condemnation of the Prime Minister. It's been said we have the Five Eyes ,but after nine years of this Prime Minister it's become increasingly the four eyes where Canada has been left out, including AUKUS as an example, where our allies shut Canada out.
There are other instances, but that's what happens when you have a Prime Minister who has gone along with Beijing far too often and allowed Beijing to interfere in two elections, who turned a blind eye to the fact that one of his own members was compromised and that he knew about it. And there's the fact that Beijing has set up illegal police stations targeting Chinese Canadians. That's what has happened after nine years of this Prime Minister.
With respect to the motion before us and the cyber-attack on 19 members of Parliament, this is something that should concern all members of Parliament because it was members of all political parties who were targeted and who were kept in the dark, who wouldn't have known but for an unsealed indictment from the U.S. Department of Justice that led to the ruling of the Speaker of a prima facie question of privilege and this committee's undertaking the study of the question of privilege. We have had hearings, and we were at a point where we were about to look to conclude this study until we discovered that there were a number of reasons why this study ought not to be concluded at this present time. One is that this committee had ordered that this government produce documents and produce them by August 9. We received—