I would agree.
There are three concerns that I would have with that approach.
The first is section 3 of the charter. The whole idea of the right to vote is individual, and the right to run is individual. The statute itself is a statute that talks about individual members of Parliament being elected. If an individual is elected as a member of Parliament, then they are not required to stay with the party that they came to Parliament with.
Those are the three concerns. One is the statute itself, which talks about electing individuals. Number two is that the individuals, once elected, are free to go to any party. Number three is that the charter itself sets up rights that are individual in nature.
The approach of putting a party name in seems to be—at least from my perspective, and I don't have any case law on this—inconsistent with all three of those approaches.