I'm sorry. Okay. Thank you.
OpenMedia did some work on a number of the companies that were employed by political parties at federal, provincial and municipal levels. It came out to be about 90 different enterprises.
My point is this: Those companies have to comply with federal and/or provincial privacy law, principally PIPEDA, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, at the federal level. Many of them will not be processing personal data from political parties, but some will, so they have to ensure that this information is provided with appropriate consent, typically. That has been stated by the federal and provincial privacy commissioners in a decision involving AggregateIQ, which was the company that was implicated in the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
My point about Bill C-65 is that however much you amend it, it's still going to be inconsistent with the rules that companies are going to be having to abide by. Therefore, it is not providing the uniform regime for political parties and the use of personal information in political campaigning that the bill claims to achieve.
I hope that's clear.