Thank you, Mr. Chair. I probably won't take the full five minutes. I just want to get clarity.
Mr. Reid, my colleague mentioned that, at the end of the day, if a whip whips a vote, wouldn't that undo the intent? However, I think that the intent of this motion is to make sure all members are heard or have the opportunity, should they want, to debate an item with respect to the changing of the Standing Orders. It's not, at the end of the day, what the outcome of a vote would be, but that, at least this way, it's not a government being able to limit the debate or people's ability to participate in that debate. That's the intent of this motion. Is that correct?