Actually, that's where I was going with this. You mentioned “all recognized parties” when you had debate on this motion. Currently, a recognized party has 12 members. We are moving to 343 after the next election. Do you think that also needs to be reflected?
We also had situations in which there were more people sitting as independents. Therefore, if we go with only recognized parties or a consensus versus unanimous consent—which I can understand—that also limits the ability of smaller parties, then, to have an opportunity to weigh in on that. What are your thoughts on that?