Mr. Cooper, I'm going to interject again. I don't want to be forced into a situation between you and me where I have to make a more stern ruling on relevance. I would ask that you get back to the motion.
You have indicated that you believe relevance is founded in the connection to the corruption that you allege has taken place by government officials and Mr. Boissonnault. However, again, I'm reading very clearly the terms of the motion you put forward, which is what we are debating at the moment, and I would ask that you get there. There will only be so many times that I'll afford you the opportunity to say, “I'm getting there”, so I would ask that you get there. Of course, the floor is always yours to speak with relevance to the motion, but you are skirting that territory pretty clearly.
Thank you, Mr. Cooper.