The reason I say that it should be done proactively is that it's going to happen. With 5,000 locations, regardless of the time of the year, it's going to be a legitimate concern and an issue that happens.
The line I probably overused was how you get to yes in terms of making sure that more places—even though outbreak does happen, where the health and safety of the staff and residents is paramount, but so is having ease in the democratic process. Proactively have that policy in place to say, “Here are some protocols we are developing with extra measures such as procurement that the returning office may proactively have in the event of something happening.” Again, the plexiglass shields, masking and having that stuff available, particularly in long-term care settings, might be something that gets more people to say yes at the end of the day.
The last question that I have for now is on list revision.
Could you provide clarification on when an administrator may provide a list of residents currently residing at the polling site? Can you talk about how changes are made to the electors list of people being added and those being removed and what that process is?