I don't know the number offhand. I would reiterate that it misses the point that I didn't go behind closed doors to move the date of the next election back so that I would qualify for a pension. I also am not a member of Parliament who goes out and says that he has ripped up an agreement; says that the Liberals are too weak, too selfish and too beholden to corporate interests; and then, when given the opportunity to stand by those words, abandons those words and sells Canadians out, sells out to Justin Trudeau.
Further, if it is all one big misunderstanding about pensions with respect to Mr. Singh, then the NDP should welcome this subamendment because it would absolutely clear the air. It would prove that I'm wrong in my submissions about why it is that Mr. Singh is propping up Justin Trudeau's costly and corrupt government. I would say that Canadians shouldn't hold their breaths. It's pretty obvious what the NDP are going to do. They're going to defeat the subamendment and continue to prop up Justin Trudeau's government so that Jagmeet Singh can get his pension on February 25.