Evidence of meeting #137 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was vote.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Rachel Pereira  Director, Electoral and Senatorial Policy Unit, Privy Council Office
Robert Sampson  General Counsel and Senior Director, Legal Services, Office of the Chief Electoral Officer
Trevor Knight  General Counsel, Office of the Chief Electoral Officer
Candice Ramalho  Senior Policy Officer, Privy Council Office
Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Christine Holke

1:50 p.m.

Conservative

Brad Redekopp Conservative Saskatoon West, SK

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

Very quickly, I want to add a couple of things.

I'm new to this committee. I've just been observing here for the last little while. What I find interesting is that the coalition is very strong between the Liberals and the NDP. It's very clear, from what I've observed here, that the support is going back and forth.

I also want to point out that the NDP apparently.... I think the situation here is that they got caught in this. They tried to say they wanted to roll this back to the original date, as if to say, “Oops, this was a mistake.” I'm looking at a picture of when Dominic LeBlanc was announcing this. I believe Daniel Blaikie from the NDP was there. The NDP wrote this legislation with the Liberals. This was not a mistake. This was a case of someone getting caught. It was the NDP that got caught. For them to all of a sudden fess up and say, “Oops, you know, it was just an honest mistake” is quite preposterous.

I just wanted to make that very clear. I don't buy it. I don't think Canadians buy it. Canadians want an election. If the NDP were serious about this, quite frankly, they would vote against the government tonight when we have some bills, and we would be in an election as of tomorrow.

I just wanted to point that out to the committee. I think it's important that we recognize it.

Thank you.

The Chair Liberal Ben Carr

Colleagues, we have no additional speakers. We're going right to a vote on the subamendment.

(Subamendment negatived: nays 7; yeas 4)

Colleagues, this means we now resume debate on the amendment.

Is there a point of order somewhere?

Kody Blois Liberal Kings—Hants, NS

Mr. Chair, I just listened to the Conservatives talk about the importance of pensions and not bringing into disrepute why people serve in Parliament. Ms. Barron's amendment right now would make sure that MPs who served in 2019 aren't inadvertently getting a pension, so let's just bring this....

The Chair Liberal Ben Carr

I appreciate what you're asking for, but you don't have the floor, Mr. Blois.

Mr. Cooper does have the floor.

Kody Blois Liberal Kings—Hants, NS

Please let us do this right now.

The Chair Liberal Ben Carr

Is there a point of order, Mr. Turnbull?

Ryan Turnbull Liberal Whitby, ON

Yes, on a point of order, I want to clarify something, Chair. Mr. Cooper had the floor when he moved his subamendment. After that subamendment was debated and voted on—

The Chair Liberal Ben Carr

He retains the floor.

Ryan Turnbull Liberal Whitby, ON

Okay.

The Chair Liberal Ben Carr

However, Mr. Turnbull, I do have you next on that speaking list.

I have Mr. Cooper.

1:55 p.m.

Conservative

Damien Kurek Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

I have a point of order, Chair.

The Chair Liberal Ben Carr

Yes, Mr. Kurek.

1:55 p.m.

Conservative

Damien Kurek Conservative Battle River—Crowfoot, AB

I'd like to be put on the speaking list.

The Chair Liberal Ben Carr

You don't need to raise a point of order for that, but thank you. You could just give me a nudge, nudge, wink, wink next time.

Mr. Cooper, go ahead.

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

I'm going to be moving a subamendment that amendment NDP-2 proposing to amend clause 5 of Bill C-65 be amended by adding the following after “tion”: “However, the first general election after this section comes into force is to be held”—

The Chair Liberal Ben Carr

Mr. Cooper, I'm going to interrupt you briefly. The clerk doesn't have this. I'm going to ask your team, as you're reading this into the record, to please have this translated into both official languages and sent to the clerk for distribution. This is a point that members on this side were upset with me about earlier, and I want to make sure that we're consistent.

Mr. Cooper, continue.

1:55 p.m.

Conservative

Michael Cooper Conservative St. Albert—Edmonton, AB

We will be sure to get that to the clerk as soon as possible.

Let me read that again. It is that amendment NDP-2, proposing to amend clause 5 of Bill C-65, be amended by adding the following after “tion.”:

However, the first general election after this section comes into force is to be held on the later of (a) Monday, February 24, 2025, and (b) subject to subsection (3), the Monday following the 50th day after the day on which this section comes into force.

(3) For the purpose of paragraph (2)(b), if the Monday referred to in that paragraph is a holiday, the polling day shall be held on the Tuesday after that Monday and any time specified under this Act before or after polling day is to be calculated as if polling day were the Monday.

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

I have a point of order.

The Chair Liberal Ben Carr

I have Mr. McKinnon.

Ron McKinnon Liberal Coquitlam—Port Coquitlam, BC

It seems to me that this subamendment basically replicates the subamendment that we just defeated. I would suggest that on that basis it's out of order.

The Chair Liberal Ben Carr

I'm just in the process of discussing that. Because I don't have a physical copy, I was trying to keep one ear open to Mr. Cooper and another ear open to a discussion with my legislative clerk.

Nonetheless, I'm going to suspend temporarily because (a) it needs to be distributed and (b) I need a judgment call on this. I'm keeping an eye on the clock as well.

I'm suspending very briefly, colleagues. Don't go anywhere.

2 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Ben Carr

Colleagues, upon consultation, it is an admissible amendment.

However, resources have now expired, colleagues, and the meeting is adjourned.