Based on what you just said, are there specific things you could point to that would not be implementable, given Mr. Cooper's subamendment here? That would be deeply concerning.
It would undermine the other aspects of this piece of legislation, I would think: to increase voter participation, to limit disenfranchisement, to ensure the maximum number of electors in many segments of the population can participate fully and, also, to prevent foreign interference.
Those are some of the other policy objectives that are incorporated into Bill C‑65, as I understand it. Are there specific examples you can point to of things that would not be implementable within the time frame that Mr. Cooper's subamendment would handcuff us to?