Madam Chair, we do have a website, and it does contain information that would be useful to members of Parliament, but the manner in which the code is currently constructed tells us essentially that I have no authority to talk about any issue—section 26 of the code prohibits me from publicizing any advice that is sought and any advice that is given—unless I do so in a manner that doesn't reveal the circumstances of the member who asked me the question.
We used to have information notices on our website, which at the suggestion of our legal services we removed, because we were not in a position to actually prove that each of those information notices, and everything in each information notice, was the result of a request having been made by an MP in the past. That's the box we're in, essentially.
Earlier during our discussion, we spoke about guidelines, which are different. We could table guidelines and propose guidelines, which, once they are approved by the committee and referred to the House of Commons, would be useful to MPs. It would tell them more about their obligations under the code, but without the committee's approval, I cannot proceed with publishing anything of this nature.