I would like to add another thing that could be done. It relates to the approach to the rules, the conditions, that apply for interpreters working in remote settings. The institution needs to take into account that remote sound is damaging and dangerous, and, as other institutions have done, take steps to limit exposure to that sound, and to define what an in-person meeting is in a way that takes into account the fact that there are remote participants.
Any remote sound is dangerous, and we would encourage your committee to recognize that in whatever recommendations you might make.